23 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
31 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.509
[
Reply]
>>513, >>524
Am I a namefag?
No.516
[
Reply]
>>517, >>518, >>520
I was wondering if anyone strictly uses the "internet" through I2P/Tor/Etc
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.383
[
Reply]
>>384
This is my second day on i2p, I want to create an eep website. What is the best hosting company for me to use? I worry about hosting directly from home for both security reasons and uptime. I am not a whistleblower or a criminal, but I do care about privacy and I don't want to break any TOS of the hosting company that I'll use. So I was wondering if there is any i2p friendly hosting company. Thanks in advance!
1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.110
[
Reply]
>>111, >>113, >>274
Which do you think is better?
23 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.279
[
Reply]
>>280, >>503
Hi! I'm MM, I'm pretty new to the browser i2p (and this site in general). I came here due to my hatred for the surface web. Which is a pretty lame reason to go to the dark web in general. but yeah!
How are y'all?
¨
|
No.280
>>279
Hello MM,
I think that's a pretty good reason
The surface web is unfortunately becoming a few sterile walled gardens (again), so glad to see refugees coming here instead.
|
No.496
[
Reply]
>>500
Ublock is cool, I don't see ad's but i also want to give a phat middle finger to any bastard who thinks he can profit of of selling me. Is it really an invasion of privacy if it's clicks do not represent my interests? I am a coward and hide behind Mullvad VPN whilst in librewolf. Yes of course I am aware that my accounts are linked but what they gonna do? Sure I'd be allowing the trackers in but then around on an expensive wild goose chase.
¨
|
No.500
>>496
Agreed. Ublock is just if you want to not see ads and get on with your life. Ad Nauseum is for actively sabotaging advertiser campaigns. I don't think it would invade your privacy, ad nauseam clicking on random ads would jumble up the profile they build on you, wouldn't it?
Also, assuming that people install ad nauseam on a large scale and it actually becomes a problem for them, we can expect two things: That advertising will become extremely aggressive and unblockable, and that internet services will no longer be cheap or free because there will be no more ad money subsidizing them.
With that in mind, I think it's a good idea to actively support (with money) privacy-friendly projects and services that you believe in, as opposed to whatever is available. The FUTO project comes to mind.
|
No.498
[
Reply]
>>499
hi
No.400
[
Reply]
>>401, >>403
So what do you make of a 20 year old shooter somehow finding the ONE building with no security detail on it, no sniper coverage for it, AND within 150 yards of the former president?
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.